The Beatles at Apple Studios, January 1969

youworthlessthing Says:

Oct 9, 2008 - This was recorded on January 26, 1969 during the Get Back (Let It Be)sessions. It wasn't on Let It Be because recording for the LP ended on Jan 31. Clearly, the song wasn't finished in time for inclusion on that album and it was worked up for Abbey Road.

MJ1341 Says:

Oct 10, 2008 - because abbey road was the last album they recorded. Let it be was gonna be called Get back at first and about getting back to basic rock n roll after the sgt pepper era but it was abandoned halfway through. So they were working on songs for abbey road in the let it be film.

trev820 Says:

Oct 10, 2008 - yes, but i heard that the beatles didnt like the album let it be and got it shelfed and recored abbey road. and i already knew it was gonan be get back, i was just wondering why some songs on abbey road album didnt get switched over to be in the let it be album

BeatlesLuver001 Says:

Oct 11, 2008 - Yoko bitch! You can already see the control she's having over John, sneaking over to him lol

thebeatlesfreak321 Says:

Oct 11, 2008 - You should check out Let It Be if you haven't already seen it. It has loads of this stuff.

youworthlessthing Says:

Oct 11, 2008 - Out of the seventeen songs on Abbey Road twelve were rehearsed during the Get Back sessions. A lot of what was on Let It Be was included because it was in the film and wasn't on Abbey Road which had already been released. There were at least two rejected versions of the Get Back LP prepared by Glen Johns, both were rejected by the fabs. Ultimately Spector got control of the tapes and produced the Let It Be LP out of them. Both of the Johns versions of the Get Back Lp can be downloaded...

youworthlessthing Says:

Oct 11, 2008 - ...you can also download an 83 disc set of the Get Back tapes. You might as well. Also, I am 90% sure that this bit of tape is not in the film Let It Be...this site is awash with footage from those sessions that wasn't in the film.

mrtall1994 Says:

Oct 16, 2008 - oh my god yoko needs to fuck off shes so annoying no one likes her its her fault the beatles broke up in the first place

stratman123 Says:

Oct 16, 2008 - About how long was Yoko's umbilical cord during Let It Be? It must have stretched a good 8 feet! It had to be! John almost got a good 10 feet away from her before she came rambling over to check on him! I have no clue how the rest of the Beatles put up with that shit as long as they did. Imagine being in the BIGGEST BAND IN THE WORLD, and you have to work with some dumb ass bringing her mattress INTO YOUR STUDIO! It would be one thing if it was just John solo, but not the whole band!!!

stratman123 Says:

Oct 16, 2008 - Heather Mills only had one "foot-age".

candymanego Says:

Oct 17, 2008 - very interesting and cool

sbha88 Says:

Oct 18, 2008 - is george suggesting a different chord ie music theory lessons for ringo? in the end its what sounds good :)

RaPiZmCaGLa Says:

Oct 19, 2008 - lol im naked! Y

willhams Says:

Oct 20, 2008 - it wasn't totally her fault. It was Paul also. The 3 of them couldn't stand Paul because he appointed himself as "leader" of the band when Brian Epstein died in '67. You'll see in their solo recordings that they wrote a lot of songs about how Paul is an asshole and to stay away from them.

LEVITICO69 Says:

Oct 28, 2008 - The cuatros touch pianoes

craigblast Says:

Oct 30, 2008 - i noticed that to, she look like she didn`t feel comfortable or even maybe notice that the other beatles resented her being there in the first place. but when she was with john she belonged.

kirchfam Says:

Nov 7, 2008 - Yoko was evil in my opinion, the way she had total control over John. No wife should be that attached. I think that Paul and Linda were a different story.

DarthXendor Says:

Nov 8, 2008 - agree

thegreatpumpkin1313 Says:

Nov 10, 2008 - Wasn't he married to the beatles for long enough? Yoko was a cool woman man, a real artist. I think their love was true.

trev820 Says:

Nov 15, 2008 - well, if you heard her music, w/o john, she sounds totaly crazy

casthand Says:

Nov 16, 2008 - i think that whats more important than a band or anything is a persons personal freedom and right to pursue what makes them happy and if yoko made john happy then so be it

Mihavishnu Says:

Nov 18, 2008 - man, u got to put the rest of the tape dude, dont leave us like that!!! come on man!! Love you all

lucasdimitri Says:

Nov 19, 2008 - "the way she had total control over John" well that means HE`s dumbass

siderap101 Says:

Nov 20, 2008 - Yoko was a fucking asian slut. I don't like her, she makes me throw up. John had to fuck chicks and than dump them, he was a god. What he did was a mistake, too bad he isn't here to make it right. GOD BLESS JOHN AND THE BEATLES.(let the devil rape yoko ono when she finaly is death)

nmzanie Says:

Nov 22, 2008 - i noticed how you said "yoko was a cool woman man" hahaha she was a woman/man nobody knows which one!!! :D